Loading Poker.Forum…

Rip David Sklansky

34 replies

boxwaxerMicro-Stakes Grinder5 posts
Posted Mar 24, 2026, 4:10 PM#1

Anyone learn from or read any of his books?

KetoupitouMicro-Stakes Grinder9 posts
Posted Mar 24, 2026, 4:24 PM#2

Ouch… Very sad to hear. I don't read his books, but I hear his name.

Natiq 90Newbie4 posts
Posted Mar 24, 2026, 4:39 PM#3

Yes! I've read his work and honestly it changed how I think about poker fundamentally.

The Theory of Poker was a revelation for me. The concept of the Fundamental Theorem of Poker sounds simple on the surface — every time your opponent makes a decision they would not make if they could see your cards, you gain. But the deeper you think about it, the more it reshapes everything about how you approach the game.

Before reading Sklansky I was playing by feel and instinct. After — I started thinking in terms of ranges, equity (https://www.casino.us/poker/strategy/poker-equity/) and decision quality rather than just results.

That said, some of his work feels a bit dated now compared to modern GTO concepts. The game has evolved. But the foundational thinking he introduced? Still completely relevant.

He's one of those authors where you read the book once and think you understood it. Then you re-read it six months later and realize you missed half of it the first time.

boxwaxerMicro-Stakes Grinder5 posts
Posted Mar 24, 2026, 4:58 PM#4

Well said. Couldn’t agree more

Poker OrificeShark278 posts
Posted Mar 30, 2026, 5:34 PM#5

Anyone learn from or read any of his books?

I haven't read any of his books although I'm pretty sure I've got a copy of 'Theory of Poker' laying around somewhere. I know I've got a ton of Sklansky Bucks stashed away.

That's too bad he's passed away. He is a legend in the poker world for sure!

Poker OrificeShark278 posts
Posted Mar 30, 2026, 5:36 PM#6

<--- Don Cearily

Poker_MikeMicro-Stakes Grinder21 posts
Posted Mar 30, 2026, 9:01 PM#7

I was sad to hear about his passing due to heart disease.

Sklansky's books opened my eyes to the real game of no limit poker.

I still want to read more about his perspective on the math of poker.

pjokayMicro-Stakes Grinder15 posts
Posted Apr 1, 2026, 6:42 PM#8

I have one of his but never got round to reading it but should although so much has changed with poker. Could do with going back to books as spent a lot on online courses and not picked up much. But did read the Harringtons which were quite chunky but good. Sklansky was meant to provide good theory though.

thedarkmanRegular44 posts
Posted Apr 1, 2026, 7:02 PM#9

I know the name, little else.

hardongearShark162 posts
Posted Apr 3, 2026, 5:16 PM#10

I have many of Sklansky's and Dan Harrington's books and they both really helped build my game and are still in parts of my game. Not sure how I missed this thread but I'm sorry to hear of Sklansky's passing. While man may not have been the best human and I don't support some of the things he's done I do respect the fact I'm play I am today in part because of his books. RIP.

Cheers!!!

TeUnitShark109 posts
Posted Apr 3, 2026, 6:04 PM#11

He was one of the first to speak to the evils of sitter limping, only he called it "bad passive play", because the term "sitter limping" had not been invented yet.

AI summarizes as:

What Sklansky Says Specifically (paraphrased from his books and 2+2 forum posts)​ (https://www.casino.us/cardschat/poker-news-events-63/rip-david-sklansky-561135/#-what-sklansky-says-specifically-paraphrased-from-his-books-and-2-2-forum-posts)

"Never limp first in."

If you are the first to enter a pot (no one has raised), you should either fold or raise. Limping is mathematically inferior.

"Limping behind other limpers is sometimes OK."

In multi-way pots with several limpers already, completing from the small blind or limping on the button with a speculative hand (small pair, suited connector) can be profitable if the blinds are unlikely to raise. But even then, raising is often better.

"The only exception is the small blind."

In a multi-way pot, completing from the small blind with any two cards can be correct because you are getting a discount. But Sklansky notes that many players overuse this and should raise more often from the small blind.

"Limping is a sign of a weak player."

In The Theory of Poker, he argues that consistent limping is a leak. Strong players raise or fold; they rarely call.

What About "Sitter Limping"?​ (https://www.casino.us/cardschat/poker-news-events-63/rip-david-sklansky-561135/#-what-about-sitter-limping)

That's free money in the pot. You should raise to isolate the dead money, not limp behind it.

Limping behind a dead blind is even worse than limping normally — you are letting live players see a cheap flop with you while there is free money to be claimed.

Summary Table: Sklansky on Limping​ (https://www.casino.us/cardschat/poker-news-events-63/rip-david-sklansky-561135/#-summary-table-sklansky-on-limping)

ScenarioSklansky's Recommendation First to enter potRaise or fold. Never limp. After 1-2 limpers, early positionFold or raise. Limping is bad. After 3+ limpers, on button or cutoffLimping can be OK with speculative hands, but raising is usually better. Small blind with multiple limpersCompleting is fine; raising is often better. Against a known limperRaise them relentlessly from late position.

The One Exception Sklansky Acknowledges​ (https://www.casino.us/cardschat/poker-news-events-63/rip-david-sklansky-561135/#-the-one-exception-sklansky-acknowledges) In very deep-stacked, passive, live cash games where players rarely raise pre-flop, limping behind with suited connectors or small pairs can be profitable if you have excellent post-flop skills. But he still emphasizes that raising is usually more profitable in the long run.

His books helped advanced some of the great players we see today, and helped people save a ton of Sklansky bucks.

RIP

Navin SarabjeetMicro-Stakes Grinder8 posts
Posted Apr 3, 2026, 6:12 PM#12

Anyone learn from or read any of his books?

A true legend has left us.

RIP

RosyllyMicro-Stakes Grinder17 posts
Posted Apr 3, 2026, 6:17 PM#13

I’be never read of any his books

May he rest in peace though

rei signoRegular53 posts
Posted Apr 3, 2026, 10:16 PM#14

My condolences! Amen.

Pioneer of poker theory!

skaterickShark114 posts
Posted Apr 12, 2026, 9:19 AM#15

us old timers all had his first hold em guides .

RENEY444Shark113 posts
Posted Apr 13, 2026, 6:30 PM#17

I wish i still had all my old poker books ..... loaned too many out and never saw them again !

LUKADONCICMVPRegular76 posts
Posted Apr 13, 2026, 8:00 PM#18

#rip didn't learn from him obv

WrongUsernameRegular87 posts
Posted Apr 13, 2026, 8:14 PM#19

rip he was a great influence for poker

HighfishNewbie2 posts
Posted Apr 13, 2026, 8:22 PM#20

RIP David. Besides, I still have a lot of Slansky buxx. 🙂

EarnDAStackNewbie3 posts
Posted Apr 14, 2026, 2:58 PM#21

Very sad to hear.

I've never read any of his books but my poker friends and I often refer to "Sklansky Dollars" when we lose a big pot in a big spot.

... Just think of all those Sklansky dollars you just made 🙂

I'm sure David, Doyle, Stu and Mike Sexton are playing one heck of a game right now in Poker Heaven 🙌

sibkazMicro-Stakes Grinder16 posts
Posted Apr 14, 2026, 3:08 PM#22

There was a story with him not long ago when even someone here condemned him...

navadagroupNewbie1 posts
Posted Apr 14, 2026, 3:40 PM#23

Wow awful news, currently reading his The Theory of Poker, very easy worked examples throughout the book.

chillibearNewbie2 posts
Posted Apr 14, 2026, 3:45 PM#24

A Legend!

RIP 🙏

TCeNTuRioNMicro-Stakes Grinder8 posts
Posted Apr 16, 2026, 2:32 PM#25

R.I.P rest in peace! legend!

valeski 28Regular41 posts
Posted Apr 20, 2026, 10:58 PM#26

A true legeng of this game.RIP Master!

ColbefcMicro-Stakes Grinder14 posts
Posted Apr 20, 2026, 11:14 PM#27

RIP David.

Kenzie 96Micro-Stakes Grinder10 posts
Posted Apr 21, 2026, 3:08 PM#28

RIP, been a while but I think he was the first I read seriously.

Poker OrificeShark278 posts
Posted Apr 21, 2026, 10:07 PM#29

There was a story with him not long ago when even someone here condemned him...

That was because David Sklansky was arrested in Jan. 2026 for domestic battery. He was released from jail but had to post bail. Charges were later dropped for undisclosed reasons. People don't look too highly upon domestic battery... my guess why someone was condemning him (or his alleged actions).

Scarlet1234Newbie1 posts
Posted May 21, 2026, 7:29 PM#31

Famous name; we all will miss him..

machinm19Regular36 posts
Posted May 21, 2026, 9:17 PM#32

I'm going to take my David Sklansky books with me for my poker trip this weekend, hopefully I can use some of his knowledge to get a good result.

Marcos1315Micro-Stakes Grinder6 posts
Posted May 22, 2026, 2:04 PM#33

😢😢

I think the first poker book I ever read was by him.

RIP

CookingRegular28 posts
Posted May 22, 2026, 11:50 PM#34

Oh, that’s so sad. I hadn’t heard the news. I’ve read very few books, but I did read his (and Doyle books too).

aajfilhoRegular25 posts
Posted May 31, 2026, 1:03 PM#35

😢😢

Real players. Deep discussions. Better poker.poker.forum